澳门金沙娱乐城-澳门金沙娱乐场_澳门百家乐官网_全讯网新2开户(中国)·官方网站

En

向凡:An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law

來(lái)源: 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2024-01-17 20:00 點(diǎn)擊數(shù): Views

向凡:An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law

期刊名:《Hong Kong Law Journal》(SSCI),2023年第53卷第3期

ABSTRACT:This article explores the power of the Central People’s Government (CPG) to issue directives to the Chief Executive (CE) under art 48(8) of the Hong Kong Basic Law (BL). It suggests tthat the CPG’s power of issuing directives to the CE bears some resemblance to both the British Crown’s power to issue directives to the Hong Kong governor and the People’s Republic of China State Council’s power to give decisions and orders to the local government. However, attributing the origin of the CPG’s power solely to either of them is challenging due to the differing scope involved. The article also notes that art 48(8) of the BL had never undergone any textual changes during the entire drafting process; there were some controversies surrounding the scope of the CPG’s directives and their legal effects, however. Through normative analysis, this article resolves four ambiguities in art 48(8), namely, which organ of the central authorities should be the CPG, what kinds of affairs could be instructed by the CPG through a directive, whether CE has the duty to implement every and each of CPG’s directives and whether Hong Kong’s courts could exercise judicial control over CE’s implementation of directives. Furthermore, it differentiates between issuing a directive and a letter to the CE by the CPG. The article argues that art 48(8) of the BL empowers the CPG to supervise Hong Kong’s exercise of administrative power, but it should not be seen as a licence for unrestricted use. It recommends the cautious use of directive power by the CPG to uphold the “executive-led” principle and respect Hong Kong’s autonomy.


(來(lái)源 深圳大學(xué)港澳基本法研究中心)

至尊娱乐城| 芒康县| 皇冠网百家乐官网啊| 网上百家乐官网骗钱| 六合彩公司| 中华百家乐娱乐城| 现场百家乐的玩法技巧和规则 | 新锦江百家乐官网娱乐场| 关于百家乐切入点| 百家乐代理在线游戏可信吗网上哪家平台信誉好安全 | 大发888娱乐游戏账号| 15人百家乐官网桌布| 百家乐视频游戏双扣| 百家乐分路单| 百家乐官网经典路单| 大发888如何下载| 百家乐赌场破解方法| 百家乐设备电子路| 运城百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 澳门百家乐官网实战视频| 威尼斯人娱乐城送钱| 德州扑克加注规则| 开心8| 百家乐官网娱乐平台开户| 百家乐官网翻天粤语版| 石屏县| 百家乐庄闲和游戏机| 澳门百家乐是骗人的| 最好的百家乐博彩网站| 大发888官方下载 银行| 从化市| 现金百家乐下载| 现金百家乐官网技巧| 百家乐官网二十一点游戏| 新世纪百家乐娱乐城| 德州扑克 术语| 百家乐官网视频游戏网站| 百家乐官网博彩优惠论坛| 金宝博百家乐娱乐城| 百家乐官网娱乐城提款| 百家乐赌场博彩赌场网|